Narcotics case: Judge Thanikachalam’s observations

[ http://www.dinakaran.com ]

” Looking at the FIR, it appears to be a foisted case. It is not clear what prosecution is trying to convey in the FIR. You have said that the accused wanted Ravi Subramaniam to be eliminated when he come to court on April 27th. How could the accused have redicted that the case will come for hearingon April 27th? If they had conspired, then they can be booked under 120Bfor conspiracy. Why were they booked under section 20-(1) ? There are contradictions. The police need to explain this.”

>>

Home | Site Search | Today's Update | Court Matters | Media Scan | Points to Ponder | You said it

Miscellaneous | Photo Gallery | Tid Bits

 

© Copyright kanchi-sathya.org
No part of this web site may be reproduced without explicit permission from the webmaster.
Some material put up on this web site are protected by individual copyrights of the concerned organisations.
This site is optimised for 800 x 600 resolution or higher.